It’s very obvious and would be stupid to ignore the impact Dan houser has had on multiple franchises for R*, him and his team of senior writers/developers brought the mastermind into the titles we know and love.
However why are people claiming things like, guarantee Dan left because of Take 2 or Take 2 have ruined R? There’s no evidence to suggest any sort of negative relationship between the two of the them. R are Take 2’s highest earning subsidiary by a country mile, so to suggest they would pressure him out of office intentionally or subconsciously is ludicrous imo.
He most likely left on his terms, or wanted to pursue something elsewhere, he’s not locked eternally at R? I’ve also seen people claiming both R and Dan are finished after this decision which is ridiculous and honestly made me chuckle I mean this is the level of obscurity people will drop to. Absolutely unequivocally untrue, people need to sit back and realise the company is far from finished but evolving imo for the better.
And please stop suggesting all these reasons Dan has left left you don’t know so stop coming up with these theories, you don’t need to know why he’s left and he shouldn’t publicly announce the reason. All you are required to know is there will be a suitable replacement found by himself and the company carries on, not negatively impacted in anyway.
Finally stop making up these ridiculous claims that Take 2 will ruin the company and drive it to the ground, I’ve worked in the industry for nearly 7 years and I’ve not seen an ounce of negative relationship here. You aren’t qualified to say take 2 will ruin R* nor do you have the evidence to suggest it. People also think comparing R* to lesser companies also under the guise of take 2 strengthens their arguement which it doesn’t btw.
No comments:
Post a Comment